Investigation into Mechanical Behavior of Air-Hardening Organic Polymer-Stabilized Silty Sand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Air-hardening organic polymer (AHOP), a new soil stabilizer, can form a cross-link among soil particles with high strength and toughness. In this study, the effect of the polymer content and density on the mechanical behavior of stabilized silty sand was investigated. The results indicate that the unconfined compressive strength and tensile strength of stabilized silty sand keep a prominent linear relationship with AHOP content that increases with the increment in density; the increment in AHOP content also leads to a higher elastic modulus of stabilized silty sand. The cohesion was also significantly enhanced by the increase in AHOP content and density; the internal friction angle of loose specimens (ρ≤1.50 g/cm3) keeps increasing with AHOP content; however, for dense specimens (ρ≥1.55 g/cm3), 3% polymer content is a turning point, at which the internal friction angle changes nonmonotonically. AHOP film can connect loose silty sand particles and adhere to the surface of particles, leading to silty sand with good strength properties. Based on failure modes, the failure of polymer–particle interactions can be divided into four modes, including (1) tensile fracture at membrane, (2) tensile fracture at polymer–particle interface, (3) shear at membrane, and (4) shear at polymer–particle interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".