MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293001316 · doi:10.54097/hset.v8i.1196

Unleashing Anti-Tumor Activity of Natural Killer Cells Via Modulation of Immune Checkpoints Receptors and Molecules

2022· article· en· W4293001316 on OpenAlexaff
Yifei Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights in Science Engineering and Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyReceptorIntracellularSignal transductionInnate immune systemBiologyImmune systemCancer immunotherapyImmune checkpointImmunotherapyCancer researchImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As vital innate lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells suppress cancer progression chiefly by inducing cell lysis and secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines. NK cell activation relies on the balance between inhibitory and stimulating signals mediated by a wide range of surface receptors. Specific receptors initiate intracellular signaling pathways, which are negatively regulated by specific checkpoint molecules. Synergistic activation is controlled by Cbl proteins and GSK-3β, while the downstream signaling pathways induced by ITIM-bearing receptors are regulated by SHP-1. These intracellular NK checkpoints are attractive targets for immune checkpoint blockade therapies, but not enough attention has been given. Hence, this paper discusses the major signaling pathways regulated by the intracellular checkpoints and their potential clinical application. The current progress in the investigation of NK checkpoint receptors is also summarized. This paper aims to promote the development of novel immunotherapies that optimize the tumor-suppressive activity of NK cells while suppressing tumor immunological evasion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighlights in Science Engineering and TechnologySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207