Development of an Intelligent Solution for the Optimization of Hybrid Energy Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a proposal for the development of a new intelligent solution for the optimization of hybrid energy systems. This solution is of great importance for installers of hybrid energy systems, as it helps them obtain the best configuration of the hybrid energy system (efficient and less expensive). In this solution, it is sufficient to enter the name of the location of the hybrid energy system that we want to install; after that, the solution will show the name of the best technology from which the optimal configuration of this system can be obtained. To accomplish this goal, the study relied on the ontology approach for two reasons, one of which is related to the nature of hybrid systems, because it is characterized by a large amount of information that requires good structuring, and the second reason is the interaction of hybrid energy systems with the external environment (climate, site characteristics). Afterward, to develop the knowledge base of the ontology, many steps were followed, the first of which is related to a detailed study of the existing one and the extraction of the basic elements, such as the concepts and the relations between them, followed by the development of the rules of intelligent reasoning, which is an interaction between the elements of the ontology through which all possible cases are treated. The “Protégé” software was used to edit these elements and perform the simulation process to show the results of the developed solution. Finally, the paper includes a case study, and the results show the importance of the developed solution, and it is open to future developments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".