Explainable 1DCNN with demodulated frequency features method for fault diagnosis of rolling bearing under time-varying speed conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearings under non-stationary and time-varying speed conditions is still a challenging task. At the same time, a reasonable explanation for an intelligent diagnosis model based on features is currently lacking. Therefore, we exploit an explainable one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN) model by combining with the demodulated frequency features of vibration signals and apply it to the fault classification of rolling bearings under time-varying speed conditions. First, the speed signals obtained by the speed encoder were transformed into generalized demodulation operator (GDO). Second, combined with the sensitive frequency band and GDO, the generalized demodulation algorithm was used to extract the frequency features from the amplitude envelope of the vibration signal. Subsequently, the proposed lightweight 1DCNN was trained to classify the frequency features and identify the health states of the rolling bearing. Finally, the local interpretable model-agnostic explanations model was utilized to explain the proposed model based on the features which own weight. It is found that the internal classification mechanism of the lightweight 1DCNN is realized according to the distribution of fault features, which is consistent with the process of human brain analysis. Two kinds of time-varying speed datasets which come from the University of Ottawa and XJTU are tested and verified. The results show that compared with other intelligent fault diagnosis methods, the identification error of the proposed method is lower and the diagnosis stability is better. The average diagnostic accuracy was 96.26% and 99.82%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".