MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293066823 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsac079.727

0731 What is HSAT Missing? A Comparison of Respiratory Events and OSA Diagnosis Across Type 2 and Type 3 Studies

2022· article· en· W4293066823 on OpenAlexaff
Kari Lambing, Eric Chalmers, Bethany Gerardy, Magdy Younes, A. N. Bender

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRespiratory disturbance indexRespiratory systemApneaSleep (system call)Sleep apneaInternal medicinePolysomnographyObstructive sleep apneaCardiologyAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction The need for having in-home sleep testing has grown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While Type 3 Home Sleep Apnea Tests (HSAT) are frequently used, their accuracy remains questionable. This study aimed to compare respiratory events and diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea between Type 2 and Type 3 studies. Methods 550 participants completed overnight Type 2 sleep studies using the Cerebra Sleep System. Files were autoscored as a type 2 acquisition and were manually edited by a RPSGT. On a second auto-score, mapped file channels were reduced to nasal cannula, chest belt, SpO2, position, heart rate, and audio channels to simulate a Type 3 study. The respiratory disturbance index (RDI) in the Type 2 tests was compared to the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in the simulated Type 3 files using a 4% desaturation threshold. Diagnosis of severity of OSA was classified based on indices of <5 as “None”, 5-14.99 as “Mild”, 15-29.99 as “Moderate”, and above 30 as “Severe”. Results 5 records were removed for having a TST <4 hours. Type 2 sleep tests detected significantly more respiratory events (21.0±21.2/hr.) compared to Type 3 tests (13.4 ±17.2; t(549) = 26.8, p<.0001). The use of the Type 2 RDI resulted in 104 patients (18.9% of patients; 39.4% of treatable patients) with moderate OSA falling into the mild category under the Type 3 AHI. The number of treatable patients was thus 71% higher with a Type 2 study. Overall, the diagnoses of Type 2 RDI and Type 3 AHI were only in agreement for 263 out of the 550 records, or 47.8% of the time. Conclusion The use of a Type 2 study detected more respiratory events than the Type 3 device. Consequentially, 104 patients received a higher severity of obstructive sleep apnea when the EEG information was included. Our results provide support for the use of Type 2 devices for in-home detection of obstructive sleep apnea to provide more accurate diagnostic detection than the more frequently used Type 3 home sleep apnea tests. Support (If Any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207