MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293066965 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsac079.172

0174 The Odds Ratio Product as a Marker of Sleep Homeostasis

2022· article· en· W4293066965 on OpenAlexaff
Darion Toutant, Magdy Younes, Marcus Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsNon-rapid eye movement sleepSleep (system call)AudiologyElectroencephalographyPsychologyMedicineNeuroscienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Classic EEG markers of sleep homeostasis (process S) usually study the level and amount of slow wave activity (SWA). In recent years, the odds ratio product (ORP) has been described as a novel quantitative measure of sleep depth (and conversely, arousability), which is derived from a four-digit permutation of the power in four respective frequency bands. Therefore, we sought to determine whether the ORP can also be used as a novel quantitative marker of process S. Methods Utilizing C3/C4 electrodes with TP9/TP10 reference, ORP was calculated from 25 nights in 15 patients. We used ORP from REM and NREM1-3 segments/bouts in each person’s night(s) with varying number of data points per REM segment(s) in each night(s). Artifacts and wake segments were discarded from analysis. Average ORP is calculated for an individual bout per night per patient. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) modelling used GEEQBOX MATLAB toolbox to identify change in sleep depth over bouts. Resultant beta (β) values represented change in nightly sleep depth over sequential NREM/REM segments per patient. Significance was p≤0.000833. Results From 15 people in the epilepsy monitoring unit, 3 did not have epilepsy. In NREM, the average ORP for C3/C4 is 1.26/1.19 (n=146307/125709). Average number of nightly NREM segments for C3/C4 are 4.64/4.9 (n=1261.27/1282.74 average ORP values per nightly segment). In REM, the average ORP for C3/C4 is 1.44/1.44 (n=47629/43528). Average number of nightly REM segments for C3/C4 are 4.36/4.38 (n=418.68/453.33 average ORP values per nightly segment). Signifying the change in sleep depth the beta values from C3/C4 were consistently positive: REM (epilepsy 0.033/0.018, non-epilepsy 0.096/0.053), NREM (epilepsy 0.047/0.053, non-epilepsy 0.026/0.064). Conclusion As a marker of sleep homeostasis, SWA decreases across a period of sleep. Consistently positive beta values derived from ORP in both REM and NREM are comparable because they demonstrate shallower sleep depth (i.e. greater arousability) across segments over nights as sleep debt is repaid. Also as expected, REM has a higher ORP than NREM. Furthermore, our findings of positive beta values are robust against sleep stage and pathology (i.e. epilepsy). Therefore, these findings may represent a novel quantitative marker of sleep homeostasis that includes REM. Support (If Any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207