Experimental Study Of The Effect Of Tensile Strain On The Cracking Of Ultra Highly-Reinforced R/C Components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this research is to study the phenomenon of cracking in the reinforced concrete (R/C) structural elements, in particular the columns and the walls, and more particularly in the extreme regions of the walls, namely the boundary columns. Various parameters of the phenomenon of cracking will be studied, e.g., load influence, tensile strain, etc. It has to be noted the fact that load application is a monotonic axial tensile loading that simulates the strain condition that takes place at the boundary edges of reinforced concrete seismic walls. Specifically, this type of loading simulates the tensile loading that takes place during the first semi-cycle of loading under seismic dynamic events. Experimental research takes place by the construction and use of a group of 4 experimental specimens subjected to different degrees of elongation. This test group examines the tensile parameter and how it affects the cracking. The test specimens in question are all reinforced with the same ultra-high longitudinal reinforcement ratio (6.03%) and subjected to tensile degrees 10, 20, 30 and 50. Significant conclusions are reached on cracking, e.g., its extent, the size of the cracks, their positions, minimum crack width, maximum crack width, average crack width, number of cracks, etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".