MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293087436 · doi:10.25305/unj.250714

Neurological and neuropsychological characteristics of postconcussion syndrome following blast mild traumatic brain injury

2022· article· en· W4293087436 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yurii V. Zavaliy

Bibliographic record

VenueUkrainian Neurosurgical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical and Biological Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryNeuropsychologyBlast injuryMedicineAnxietyDepression (economics)CognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleNeuropsychological assessmentPhysical therapyPsychologyPediatricsPoison controlPsychiatryCognitive impairmentEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A common complication of blast mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is postconcussion syndrome (PCS), the diagnostic criteria of which are based on the patient's subjective complaints. Creation of reliable tools for clinical signs of blast mild TBI objectification is of great priority. Objective: using a comprehensive neurological and neuropsychological examination to determine the characteristics of clinical signs of blast mild TBI in the long-term period to assess the correlation with the data of neurophysiological and radiological studies. Materials and methods. The study involved 115 male participants of hostilities in the East of Ukraine (main group) with a diagnosis of " PCS after previous blast mTBI " and 30 healthy individuals (control group). Patients were in the long-term period of injury (from 6 months to 3 years). After collecting complaints and medical history data, the neurological status and the state of cognitive functions were examined. The latter were studied using the questionnaire "Cicerone". Neuropsychological testing according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MoCA) was carried out. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was also used, and to objectify asthenic disorders - the Asthenic State Scale (ASS). Results. Assessment of the severity of cognitive impairment using the questionnaire "Cicerone" allowed identifying three clinical variants of PCS: 1) with cognitive impairment in combination with affective disorders (44,3 ± 9,1) % of patients), 2) with a predominance of affective disorders (23,5 ± 7,7) % of patients), 3) moderate and mild disorders of the cognitive and affective spectrum in combination with moderate autonomic disorders ((32,2 ± 8,5) % of patients). In 43,5% of cases, according to the MoCA scale, a decrease in cognitive impairment was found for memorization (memory), attention, delayed recall, total score. According to the HADS scale, the distribution of patients was as follows: clinically significant anxiety was noted in (9,6%) patients, depression - in (11,3%) patients, combination of clinically significant anxiety with depression - in (5,2%) patients, subclinical symptoms of anxiety of various severity - in (55,7%) patients. The phenomena of asthenia due to fatigue with mood swings, loss of the ability to concentrate for a long time on mental and physical tasks occurred in all patients with PCS. Factors with a probably higher risk of cognitive impairment were identified: 1) complaints of extreme fatigue and headache, 2) neurological signs in the form of pyramidal insufficiency, brisk tendon reflexes, 3) anxiety level according to the HADS scale. They can be considered as predictors of detection of cognitive deficit in patients with PCS as a result of blast mild TBI. Conclusions. Comprehensive neurological and neuropsychological examination is an effective tool for diagnosing cognitive changes in PCS as a result of blast mild TBI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUkrainian Neurosurgical JournalSame topicMedical and Biological SciencesFrench-language works237,207