Cellular taxonomy of Hic1+ mesenchymal progenitor derivatives in the limb: from embryo to adult
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tissue development and regeneration rely on the cooperation of multiple mesenchymal progenitor (MP) subpopulations. We recently identified Hic1 as a marker of quiescent MPs in multiple adult tissues. Here, we describe the embryonic origin of appendicular Hic1+ MPs and demonstrate that they arise in the hypaxial somite, and migrate into the developing limb at embryonic day 11.5, well after limb bud initiation. Time-resolved single-cell-omics analyses coupled with lineage tracing reveal that Hic1+ cells generate a unique MP hierarchy, that includes both recently identified adult universal fibroblast populations (Dpt+, Pi16+ and Dpt+Col15a1+) and more specialised mesenchymal derivatives such as, peri and endoneurial cells, pericytes, bone marrow stromal cells, myotenocytes, tenocytes, fascia-resident fibroblasts, with limited contributions to chondrocytes and osteocytes within the skeletal elements. MPs endure within these compartments, continue to express Hic1 and represent a critical reservoir to support post-natal growth and regeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".