Individualismus und Authentizität im säkularen Zeitalter: Eine große Erzählung? – Charles Taylor zum 90.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Charles Taylor is one of the most distinguished Hegelians of the present and at the same time one of the most persistent inquirers when it comes to the record of modernity, its benefits and its losses. Over the course of his own extremely productive decades of work, he has primarily dealt with questions that remind us of the inescapability of philosophy and its history for a critical diagnosis of modernity and the present – with questions such as what an enlightened form of community and society, tradition and autonomy might look like, and what status individuality and authenticity have in this context beyond self-buffing or self-disillusionment. His guiding question was always what Hegel might still have to say to modernity and why a new look at the history of the Christian world will always be worthwhile.Charles Taylor: Hegel. Cambridge/England 1971: Cambridge University Press. XII, 580 S. Dt.: Hegel. Frankfurt/M. 1978: Suhrkamp. 772 S. -: A Secular Age. Cambridge/Mass.; London 2007: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 874 S. Dt: Ein säkulares Zeitalter. Übers v. J. Schulte, Frankfurt/M. 2009: Suhrkamp. 1299 S. -: Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge/Mass. 1989: Harvard University Press. 624 S. Dt.: Quellen des Selbst. Die Entstehung der neuzeitlichen Identität. Übers v. J. Schulte. Frankfurt/M. 1996: Suhrkamp. 912 S. -: The Malaise of Modernity. Concord, Ontario 1991: House of Anansi Press. 128 S. Dt.: Das Unbehagen der Moderne. Übers v. J. Schulte Frankfurt/M. 1995: Suhrkamp.144 S. -: Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers. 1. Cambridge, England 1985: Cambridge University Press. 304 S. Partiell auf dt. in: Negative Freiheit. Zur Kritik des neuzeitlichen Individualismus. Übers. v. H. Kocyba, Frankfurt/M. 1988: Suhrkamp. 32
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".