Dynamic Aeroelastic Performance Optimization of Adaptive Aerospace Structures Using Structural Geometric Nonlinearities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a framework for the design optimization of geometric nonlinearities developed by active elements embedded in prestressable, statically indeterminant, truss-like aerospace structures for the purpose of attenuating their dynamic aeroelastic response under turbulent aerodynamic gust conditions. Dynamic aeroelastic responses are analyzed considering random power spectral density (PSD) gust with a continuous Davenport spectrum (DS) and tuned discrete gust (TDG) with a one-minus-cosine (OMC) wind excitation profiles. A genetic optimization algorithm (GA) is utilized to determine optimal prestress values through active element actuations for the purpose of tuning the geometric stiffness and, therefore, the modal response of the structure when exposed to gust excitations. In addition, a new simplified control metric for comparing active member locations is proposed. A case study is analyzed with this methodology to minimize the pointing error of a simplified antenna structure. Pointing error attenuations of 22.1% and 17.0% were found for the structure under DS mean wind speeds of 889 (349.95) and 2,778 cm/s (1,093.61 in./s), respectively. Using the same two operating cases with the TDG excitation profile resulted in the overall pointing error to be reduced by 36.8% and 37.0%, respectively. The adaptive nature of the presented methodology allows a single actuator layout to mitigate structural response for a variety of load cases, which is a large benefit over many traditionally passive techniques. This paper expands the existing usage of geometric nonlinearities to determine optimal active element location and actuations for given optimization objectives under realistic environmental loading conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".