Review: <i>Food Insecurity on Campus: Action and Intervention</i>, edited by Katharine M. Broton and Clare L. Cady
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| August 01 2022 Review: Food Insecurity on Campus: Action and Intervention, edited by Katharine M. Broton and Clare L. Cady Food Insecurity on Campus: Action and Intervention, Edited by Katharine M. Broton and Clare L. Cady, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020 292 pp. $39.95 (paper); (eBook) Michael Classens Michael Classens University of Toronto Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Gastronomica (2022) 22 (3): 90–91. https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2022.22.3.90 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Michael Classens; Review: Food Insecurity on Campus: Action and Intervention, edited by Katharine M. Broton and Clare L. Cady. Gastronomica 1 August 2022; 22 (3): 90–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2022.22.3.90 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentGastronomica Search A deep emotional ambivalence settled over me as I read this collection. With contributions from students, staff, and scholars, the book documents the efforts of those involved in organizing for student food and basic needs security on college campuses across the United States. On the one hand, my spirits were buoyed by the dedication of the contributors and their networks of allies. Their efforts unambiguously reveal a deep humanity and an inspired persistence in the face of overwhelming, ongoing inequity and injustice. On the other hand, I was gripped by a disquieting combination of melancholy, mourning, and outrage that their efforts are needed in the first place. While there is yet no comprehensive, nationwide data documenting the rates of food insecurity among college students (this is in itself a significant issue, as noted by some contributors), a recent meta-analysis concludes that nearly half of all college students in the United... You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.066 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".