MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293174744 · doi:10.1525/gfc.2022.22.3.90

Review: <i>Food Insecurity on Campus: Action and Intervention</i>, edited by Katharine M. Broton and Clare L. Cady

2022· article· en· W4293174744 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael Classens

Bibliographic record

VenueGastronomica The Journal of Food and Culture · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood insecurityIntervention (counseling)Action (physics)SociologyPsychologyGeographyArchaeologyFood securityPhysicsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| August 01 2022 Review: Food Insecurity on Campus: Action and Intervention, edited by Katharine M. Broton and Clare L. Cady Food Insecurity on Campus: Action and Intervention, Edited by Katharine M. Broton and Clare L. Cady, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020 292 pp. $39.95 (paper); (eBook) Michael Classens Michael Classens University of Toronto Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Gastronomica (2022) 22 (3): 90–91. https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2022.22.3.90 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Michael Classens; Review: Food Insecurity on Campus: Action and Intervention, edited by Katharine M. Broton and Clare L. Cady. Gastronomica 1 August 2022; 22 (3): 90–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2022.22.3.90 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentGastronomica Search A deep emotional ambivalence settled over me as I read this collection. With contributions from students, staff, and scholars, the book documents the efforts of those involved in organizing for student food and basic needs security on college campuses across the United States. On the one hand, my spirits were buoyed by the dedication of the contributors and their networks of allies. Their efforts unambiguously reveal a deep humanity and an inspired persistence in the face of overwhelming, ongoing inequity and injustice. On the other hand, I was gripped by a disquieting combination of melancholy, mourning, and outrage that their efforts are needed in the first place. While there is yet no comprehensive, nationwide data documenting the rates of food insecurity among college students (this is in itself a significant issue, as noted by some contributors), a recent meta-analysis concludes that nearly half of all college students in the United... You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastronomica The Journal of Food and CultureSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207