MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293191463 · doi:10.18778/8220-877-1.28

Lo fantástico como vía de supervivencia para Ana Blandiana; vivir, recordar y soñar

2022· book-chapter· en· W4293191463 on OpenAlexaff
Mylène Mandart

Bibliographic record

VenueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeDreamFantasyLiteratureArtCommunismPoetryHumanitiesPsychologyPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ana Blandiana, an internationally recognized writer, has been an opponent ofthe dictatorial regime of Nicolae Ceaușescu. She is a censored poet; she has had to struggleto find a way to convey her words. She became a symbol of the resistance, and despite theprohibition she continued to write; several of her tales and poems are both a reflection anda critique of how she lived under communist totalitarianism. Blandiana finds a way tolive through writing. She ties her works to the fantasy genre, which are divided betweena dream world and a historical reality. The dream is the place chosen by the writer to beable to express herself freely through the voice of her characters. In addition to the spatialduality, Blandiana chooses to situate her narratives in a temporal duality. The protagonistsare immersed in the writer’s own past, and in an eternal present through which she projectsher hopes for a better future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooksSame topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207