MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293192584 · doi:10.3749/canmin.2000104

Composition of Diamond from the 95-2 Pipe, Lake Timiskaming Kimberlite Cluster, Superior Craton, Canada

2022· article· en· W4293192584 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Adrian Van Rythoven, Daniel J. Schulze, Richard A. Stern, Mei Yan Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKimberliteCratonDiamondGeologyMantle (geology)GeochemistryIsotopes of nitrogenNitrogenδ13CMineralogyChemistryStable isotope ratioPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Forty-one samples of diamond from the Jurassic 95-2 kimberlite pipe in the Lake Timiskaming Kimberlite Cluster, Superior Craton, Canada, were imaged using cathodoluminescence and analyzed by secondary ion mass spectrometry and Fourier-transform infrared absorbance spectrometry to determine carbon stable isotope composition, total nitrogen abundance, and nitrogen aggregation state. The carbon isotope compositions results (δ13CVPDB) range from –9.11 to –3.57‰, with a mean value of –5.8‰. Intra-stone variation is small (maximum ∼2.2‰, and in most individual diamond samples <1‰). Nitrogen contents range from 0.5 to 2040 ppm (mean of 483 ppm). The greatest range of values in a single stone is 825 ppm. The samples are poorly aggregated in terms of nitrogen. The samples are mostly type IaA or IaAB, with a few bordering on type Ib. Diamond growth was episodic, with nitrogen behaving highly compatibly (i.e., D = [N]diamond/[N]fluid >> 1). Precipitation was likely from a carbonate-rich fluid in a peridotitic (lherzolitic) environment within the mantle of the central Superior Craton. This generation of diamond growth is very similar to those reported from the Jurassic age Victor and U2 pipes of the Attawapiskat Kimberlite Cluster, and distinct from a possibly much older (>1.1 Ga) generation of diamond reported in other older host rocks (T1, Wawa, Lynx, and Renard). This older generation of diamond at these other localities is also predominantly of the peridotitic (harzburgitic) paragenesis but contains far less nitrogen (although typically more aggregated as B centers) and has higher δ13CVPDB. The younger generation of diamond formed after mantle heating during formation of the Mid-Continental Rift (ca. 1.1 Ga) destroyed any proximal prior generation(s) of diamond. Igneous activity after 1.1 Ga subsequently refertilized the cratonic mantle to a lherzolitic paragenesis in which the younger generation precipitated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207