An HTTP Anomaly Detection Architecture Based on the Internet of Intelligence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prompt expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) and its wide application in smart homes and transportation has brought tremendous convenience to people’s lives. However, the increase of IoT devices has also brought huge security problems, threatening people’s information and property security. This paper designs a new anomaly detection architecture based on the concept of the “Internet of intelligence”. It is a general architecture that can be applied to different IoT anomaly detection methods. The architecture effectively combines the blockchain and the IoT anomaly detection method, which can overcome the problems of data resource sharing and collective learning. At the same time, we propose a novel method for detecting abnormal HTTP traffic in IoT. It combines clustering and Autoencoder method to efficiently and exactly detect abnormal HTTP traffic in IoT devices. In addition, we propose an optimized feature extraction method, which is favorable to enhance the detection effect. Simulation results show the proposed architecture and method can enhance the detection performance of abnormal HTTP traffic in IoT and address the challenges of existing approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it