Multi-Objective Parallel Task Offloading and Content Caching in D2D-aided MEC Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In device to device (D2D) aided mobile edge computing (MEC) networks, by implementing content caching and D2D links, the edge server and nearby mobile devices can provide task offloading platforms. For parallel tasks, proper decisions on content caching and task offloading help reduce delay and energy consumption. However, what is often ignored in the previous works is the joint optimization of parallel task offloading and content caching. In this paper, we aim to find optimal content caching and parallel task offloading strategies, so as to minimize task delay and energy consumption. The minimization problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem, concerning both content caching and parallel task offloading. The content caching is formulated as an integer knapsack problem (IKP). To solve the IKP problem, an enhanced Binary Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm is proposed. The parallel task offloading problem is formulated as a constrained multi-objective optimization problem, an improved multi-objective bat algorithm is proposed to address the problem. Experimental results show that our algorithm can decrease delay and energy cost by at most 45% and 56%, respectively. In addition, the parallel task offloading ratio remains over 91% even with large number of mobile devices (MDs).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".