MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293212629 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2022.13.0023

Analysis of Transcriptome Sequencing and MYB Transcription Factor Family in <i>Rhododendron lapponicum</i>

2022· article· en· W4293212629 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xinping Jia, Xiaoqing Liu, Yanming Deng, Chang Li, Jiale Su

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMYBTranscriptomeBiologyGeneticsTranscription factorGeneComputational biologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MYB transcription factor is the largest family of transcription factors in plants, and they are involved in the regulation of plant growth and development, secondary metabolism, adversity stress and other biological processes. So far, there is no the study on the MYB transcription factor of Rhododendron lapponicum . In this study, the Rhododendron lapponicum variety ‘Fuli Jinling’ transcriptome was generated by SMRT sequencing technology. A total of 15.37 Gb data was obtained, and 75 002 transcript sequences were obtained by removing redundancy. 71 155, 33 653 and 30 359 transcripts were assigned to the Nr, GO and COG databases, respectively. Based on the transcriptome sequencing data, 64 transcription factor gene families were identified, including 220 MYB genes. According to the structural characteristics, the MYB gene is divided into four categories, including 1R-MYB, R2R3-MYB, R1R2R3-MYB and 4R-MYB. The amino acid sequence of MYB transcription factor contains 20 conserved elements. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the MYB genes of Rhododendron lapponicum could be divided into 28 subclasses. In this study, we first used SMRT sequencing technology to generate the Rhododendron lapponicum transcriptome. In this study, single molecule real time (SMRT) technology was used to sequence the transcriptome of the Rhododendron lapponicum variety 'Fuli Jinling', and the obtained transcript sequences were functionally annotated and classified, and 220 MYB genes for bioinformatics analysis, these related results have certain reference significance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant BreedingSame topicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207