MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293214379 · doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00313

A54145 Factor D Is Not Less Susceptible to Inhibition by Lung Surfactant than Daptomycin

2022· article· en· W4293214379 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan Moreira, Scott D. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersWaterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of WaterlooNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDaptomycinPulmonary surfactantLungMedicineInternal medicineMicrobiologyChemistryBiologyBacteriaBiochemistryVancomycin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A54145 factor D (A5D) is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic that shares several structural and mechanistic features with the clinically important antibiotic daptomycin, such as their requirement for calcium and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) for activity. Studies by others have suggested that daptomycin’s activity is strongly inhibited by lung surfactant while A5D’s activity is not. This finding has inspired efforts, albeit unsuccessful, to develop an A5D analogue that is highly active in the presence of lung surfactant and can be used for treating community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Here we demonstrate that A5D, like daptomycin, has a strong preference for the 1,2-diacyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-1′-sn-glycerol stereoisomer (2R,2′S configuration) of PG. This PG stereoisomer was determined to be the only stereoisomer of PG in lung surfactant. Both antibiotics are completely antagonized by approximately 1–2 mol equiv of 2R,2′S-PG. Studies performed in the presence of lung surfactant revealed that the antagonism of these peptides by surfactant is mainly due to their interaction with PG and that A5D is not significantly less susceptible to inhibition by lung surfactant than daptomycin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Infectious DiseasesSame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207