MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Building Instance Change Detection from High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Images with Improved Instance Segmentation Architecture

2022· article· en· W4293234904 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yan Li, Jianbing Yang, Yi Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 3rd International Conference on Geology, Mapping and Remote Sensing (ICGMRS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersResearch and DevelopmentMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsChange detectionComputer scienceRemote sensingSegmentationArchitectureArtificial intelligenceImage resolutionDeep learningSpatial analysisConvolutional neural networkImage segmentationTest setMultispectral imageData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The detection of ground surface changes can provide essential and valuable information for experts in the fields of geomatics, emergency management, and urban management. Many deep learning models have been proposed for detecting the change from remote sensing images. However, the majority of studies have not been able to simultaneously accomplish both building change detection and instance segmentation of changed buildings from high spatial resolution images. The information of the building instance change in high spatial resolution remote sensing images is crucial for disaster assessment and urban building management. To address these issues, we proposed a novel building instance change detection architecture based on the Cascade Mask R-CNN framework and designed a swin transformer siamese (STS) backbone to input the bi-temporal images and to improve the detection accuracy, called STS-ConcCMR. Due to the lack of remote sensing mask datasets, two building change detection datasets are transferred into the building instance change detection task. Our method achieves the best performance in F1 of90.7 and 94.5 points on the LEVIER-CD and WHU-CD datasets, respectively. And the performance of the proposed architecture can be effectively improved by substituting the siamese backbone for the non-siamese backbone. The AP and F1 are improved by 0.5 and 0.4 points on the LEVIR-CD test set, respectively, and by 2.6 points and 4.0 points on the WHU-CD test set. Experimental results demonstrated the superiority of the proposed architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 3rd International Conference on Geology, Mapping and Remote Sensing (ICGMRS)Same topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207