Incidence of dural metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The natural history and clinical manifestations of dural metastases (DM) in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) will change with advances in new hormonal therapy. Here, we characterised the incidence, clinical presentation, and outcomes of patients with DM in a contemporary patient cohort with CRPC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our CRPC database from 2012 to 2020. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of DM, defined as metastasis to the dura mater in the brain or spine. We describe the presenting symptoms, biochemistry, radiologic findings, and therapy sequence for all DM patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of DM. Results: Six of the 275 patients (2.2%) with CRPC developed DM. The average age of CRPC diagnosis for patients with DM was 65.6 years. Mean patient survival was 4.5 months after the diagnosis of DM. At the time of CRPC diagnosis, patients who developed DM were significantly younger, had lower baseline haemoglobin, higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) compared to those without DM. On multivariable analysis, younger age of CRPC diagnosis was found to be a predictor for DM. Conclusion: The presence of neurological symptoms in the context of younger age, anaemia, and elevated baseline LDH and ALP are associated with DM in CRPC. Level of Evidence: 4
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".