Water activity measurement on seed or pollen lots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A presentation of the measurement of the activity of water was carried out among a group of experts and scientists of the Tree Seed Working Group of the Canadian Tree Improvement Association at the time of the visit of the installations of the Seed Centre of Berthier within the framework of the pre-turn of joint congress IUFRO-ACAA/CTIA 2008 in Quebec. During a demonstration we presented the theoretical and operational aspects of the measurement of the activity of water in the laboratory of the only centre of forest seeds of Quebec which recently adopted this method for seeds and pollens management. The simplicity and the speed of acquisition of measurement as well as the non-destructive character of the procedure were underlined in particular. / Une présentation de la mesure de l'activité de l'eau a été réalisée auprès d'un groupe de praticiens et de scientifiques du Tree Seed Working Group de l'Association Canadienne d'Améliorateurs forestiers lors de la visite des installations du centre de semences de Berthier dans le cadre du pré-tour du congrès IUFRO-ACAA 2008 à Québec. Ont été présentés les aspects théoriques et opérationnels de la mesure de l'activité de l'eau lors d'une démonstration dans le laboratoire du seul centre de semences forestières du Québec qui a récemment adopté cette méthode de contrôle des semnces et pollens. La simplicité et la rapidité d'acquisition de la mesure ainsi que le caractère non destructif de la procédure ont été soulignés en particulier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".