MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293281807 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2022.3177638

Cognitive Radios Equipped With Modulation and STBC Recognition Over Coded Transmissions

2022· article· en· W4293281807 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Marey, Octavia A. Dobre, Hala Mostafa

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPrince Sultan University
KeywordsSpace–time block codeComputer scienceTransmitterCognitive radioBlock codeCoding (social sciences)Channel (broadcasting)Transmission (telecommunications)Modulation (music)MaximizationAlgorithmElectronic engineeringDecoding methodsWirelessTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signal recognition has recently emerged as a key ingredient for cognitive radios with defense and industrial uses. This letter area encompasses the recognition of a broad range of transmission aspects such as modulation format, space-time mapping, channel coding form, central frequency, and data rate. Each of these aspects has been extensively researched in the literature. Only a few works addressed co-recognition. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is a single study that is dedicated to the recognition of combined modulation and space-time block coding (STBC), with the constraints of having more receive antennas than transmit antennas and operating over frequency-flat channels. In this letter, we propose a novel algorithm that recognizes modulation and STBC simultaneously over unknown frequency-selective channels while relaxing the requirement of having more antennas at the receiver than at the transmitter. The mathematical treatments demonstrate how an iterative expectation-maximization strategy is simply used to create a maximum-likelihood solution for this problem. Additionally, we make use of soft information coupled with channel decoders to enhance the proposed algorithm’s recognition performance. The proposed design also incorporates the supplementary task of channel estimation as a part of its overall structure. According to the findings of the computational complexity analysis and simulation results, the proposed algorithm easily defeats the one documented in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicWireless Signal Modulation ClassificationFrench-language works237,207