MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293281807 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2022.3177638

Cognitive Radios Equipped With Modulation and STBC Recognition Over Coded Transmissions

2022· article· en· W4293281807 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPrince Sultan University
KeywordsSpace–time block codeComputer scienceTransmitterCognitive radioBlock codeCoding (social sciences)Channel (broadcasting)Transmission (telecommunications)Modulation (music)MaximizationAlgorithmElectronic engineeringDecoding methodsWirelessTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signal recognition has recently emerged as a key ingredient for cognitive radios with defense and industrial uses. This letter area encompasses the recognition of a broad range of transmission aspects such as modulation format, space-time mapping, channel coding form, central frequency, and data rate. Each of these aspects has been extensively researched in the literature. Only a few works addressed co-recognition. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is a single study that is dedicated to the recognition of combined modulation and space-time block coding (STBC), with the constraints of having more receive antennas than transmit antennas and operating over frequency-flat channels. In this letter, we propose a novel algorithm that recognizes modulation and STBC simultaneously over unknown frequency-selective channels while relaxing the requirement of having more antennas at the receiver than at the transmitter. The mathematical treatments demonstrate how an iterative expectation-maximization strategy is simply used to create a maximum-likelihood solution for this problem. Additionally, we make use of soft information coupled with channel decoders to enhance the proposed algorithm’s recognition performance. The proposed design also incorporates the supplementary task of channel estimation as a part of its overall structure. According to the findings of the computational complexity analysis and simulation results, the proposed algorithm easily defeats the one documented in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it