MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293335331 · doi:10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100161

Distinct epidemiological profiles of porcine circovirus 3 and fox circovirus in Canadian foxes (Vulpes spp.)

2022· article· en· W4293335331 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Marta Canuti, Bruce Rodrigues, Émilie Bouchard, Hugh Whitney, Andrew S. Lang, Suzanne C. Dufour, Joost T. P. Verhoeven

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Research in Microbial Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Virus Infections Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of SaskatchewanGovernment of Newfoundland and LabradorMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOcean Frontier InstituteArcticNetCanada First Research Excellence FundWeston Family FoundationNational Rosacea Society
KeywordsPorcine circovirusCircovirusVulpesBiologyVirologyPopulationVirusVeterinary medicineMolecular epidemiologyCladePhylogenetic treeGenotypeGeneticsGeneMedicineEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circoviruses (genus Circovirus, family Circoviridae) are ssDNA viruses that infect mammals, and they sometimes can transmit among different species. We investigated the distribution and diversity of porcine circovirus 3 (PCV-3, species Porcine circovirus 3) and fox circovirus (species Canine circovirus 1) in different populations of foxes (Vulpes spp.) inhabiting the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador to compare their epidemiological profiles. Of the 210 samples tested in this study 9 were positive for PCV-3 and 99 were positive for fox circovirus. Eight foxes were PCV-3-positive (8/128, 6.3%) and the virus was only found in the most human-populated areas. The PCV-3 positivity rate was significantly higher in stool (7/180, 8.8%) than in spleen (2/120, 1.7%: p < 0.05). Phylogenetic analyses showed that sequences from different animals were unrelated to each other. Fox circovirus was identified in 66 animals (51.6%) and positivity rates were the highest in the least human-populated areas. There were no significant differences between positivity rates in stool (32/80, 40.0%), spleen (59/120, 49.2%), or lymph nodes (8/10, 80.0%). Among 54 positive animals for which both spleen and stool samples were available, 25 (46.3%) had detectable virus in both samples. All fox circovirus sequences recovered in this study formed a monophyletic clade, and no geographic segregation of study strains was observed. The high prevalence and high genetic diversity observed for fox circovirus implies that the virus has been circulating in this population for a long time. PCV-3 cases were consistent with sporadic infections from multiple sources, possibly related to scavenging behavior and consumption of meat by-products and human waste, while fox circovirus was endemic, indicating that foxes are likely the maintenance host for this virus. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study demonstrating the presence of fox circovirus in North America and to show that PCV-3 can be detected in foxes. Future studies should evaluate the pathogenic potential of these viruses for wildlife.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Research in Microbial SciencesSame topicAnimal Virus Infections StudiesFrench-language works237,207