Comparative Analysis of Corrinoid Profiles across Host-Associated and Environmental Samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(the cyanated form of cobalamin cofactors) is best known for its essential role in human health. In addition to its function in human metabolism, cobalamin also plays important roles in microbial metabolism and can impact microbial community function. Cobalamin is a member of the structurally diverse family of cofactors known as cobamides that are produced exclusively by certain prokaryotes. Cobamides are considered shared nutrients in microbial communities because the majority of bacteria that possess cobamide-dependent enzymes cannot synthesize cobamides de novo. Furthermore, different microbes have evolved metabolic specificity for particular cobamides, and therefore, the availability of cobamides in the environment is important for cobamide-dependent microbes. Determining the cobamides present in an environment of interest is essential for understanding microbial metabolic interactions. By examining the abundances of different cobamides in diverse environments, including 10 obtained in this study, we find that, contrary to its preeminence in human metabolism, cobalamin is relatively rare in many microbial habitats. Comparison of cobamide profiles of mammalian gastrointestinal samples and wood-feeding insects reveals that host-associated cobamide abundances vary and that fecal cobamide profiles differ from those of their host gastrointestinal tracts. Environmental cobamide profiles obtained from aquatic, soil, and contaminated groundwater samples reveal that the cobamide compositions of environmental samples are highly variable. As the only commercially available cobamide, cobalamin is routinely supplied during microbial culturing efforts. However, these findings suggest that cobamides specific to a given microbiome may yield greater insight into nutrient utilization and physiological processes that occur in these habitats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".