Collateral impacts of pandemic COVID-19 drive the nosocomial spread of antibiotic resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Circulation of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MRB) in healthcare facilities is a major public health problem. These settings have been greatly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, notably due to surges in COVID-19 caseloads and the implementation of infection control measures. Yet collateral impacts of pandemic COVID-19 on MRB epidemiology remain poorly understood. Here, we present a dynamic transmission model in which SARS-CoV-2 and MRB co-circulate among patients and staff in a hospital population in an early pandemic context. Responses to SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks are captured mechanistically, reflecting impacts on factors relevant for MRB transmission, including contact behaviour, hand hygiene compliance, antibiotic prescribing and population structure. In a first set of simulations, broad parameter ranges are accounted for, representative of diverse bacterial species and hospital settings. On average, COVID-19 control measures coincide with MRB prevention, including fewer incident cases and fewer cumulative person-days of patient MRB colonization. However, surges in COVID-19 caseloads favour MRB transmission and lead to increased rates of antibiotic resistance, especially in the absence of concomitant control measures. In a second set of simulations, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli are simulated in specific hospital wards and pandemic response scenarios. Antibiotic resistance dynamics are highly context-specific in these cases, and SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks significantly impact bacterial epidemiology only in facilities with high underlying risk of bacterial transmission. Crucially, antibiotic resistance burden is reduced in facilities with timelier, more effective implementation of COVID-19 control measures. This highlights the control of antibiotic resistance as an important collateral benefit of robust pandemic preparedness. Significance Statement Impacts of COVID-19 on the spread of antibiotic resistance are poorly understood. Here, an epidemiological model accounting for the simultaneous spread of SARS-CoV-2 and antibiotic-resistant bacteria is presented. The model is tailored to healthcare settings during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and accounts for hand hygiene, inter-individual contact behaviour, and other factors relevant for pathogen spread. Simulations demonstrate that public health policies enacted to slow the spread of COVID-19 also tend to limit bacterial transmission. However, surges in COVID-19 cases simultaneously select for higher rates of antibiotic resistance. Selection for resistance is thus mitigated by prompt implementation of effective COVID-19 prevention policies. This highlights the control of antibiotic resistance as an important collateral benefit of pandemic preparedness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".