<scp>Post‐partum</scp> contraception in women living with <scp>HIV</scp>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Rates of unintended pregnancy are higher in women living with HIV than in those without HIV. The World Health Organization and the Canadian HIV Pregnancy Planning Guidelines recommend preventing unintended pregnancies and offering contraception counselling to women living with HIV to reduce the rate of perinatal HIV transmission worldwide. No studies have assessed post-partum (PP) contraception use in women living with HIV in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review including all women living with HIV followed by the Oak Tree Clinic who had a live birth between 1 January 2014 and 15 September 2019. The main objective was to quantify the proportion and types of contraception used by women living with HIV within 3 months PP and to evaluate whether contraception counselling is associated with contraception use. RESULTS: Of the 110 participants included, 79% were using contraception within 3 months PP. The most common contraception methods used were an intrauterine device in 22% of participants followed by depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in 18% of participants. Of those intending to use contraception PP, 86% and 92% were using contraception within 3 and 12 months PP, respectively. Contraception counselling during pregnancy, and up to 3 months PP, was associated with contraception use within 3 months PP (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The majority of women were using contraception within 3 months PP. Having a contraception plan resulted in a high rate of contraception use. Women living with HIV should have a PP contraception plan prior to giving birth to establish the necessary steps for starting highly reliable forms of contraception. Contraception counselling was associated with contraception use and should be incorporated during pregnancy and in the immediate PP period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".