MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293568957 · doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000003055

A Core Outcome Measurement Set for Pediatric Critical Care*

2022· article· en· W4293568957 on OpenAlexafffund
Neethi Pinto, Aline B. Maddux, Leslie A. Dervan, Alan G. Woodruff, Jessica Jarvis, Sholeen Nett, Elizabeth Y. Killien, Robert J. Graham, Karen Choong, Peter M. Luckett, Julia A. Heneghan, Katherine Biagas, Erin F. Carlton, Mary E. Hartman, Lauren Yagiela, Kelly N. Michelson, Joseph C. Manning, Debbie Long, Jan Hau Lee, Beth S. Slomine, Sue R. Beers, Trevor A. Hall, Kathleen L. Meert, M.D.P. Arias Lopez, Hennie Knoester, Amy J. Houtrow, Lenora M. Olson, Lisa Steele, Luregn J. Schlapbach, Randall S. Burd, Ruth Grosskreuz, Warwick Butt, Ericka L. Fink, R. Scott Watson

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilUniversity of Cape TownImperial College LondonNational Institutes of HealthNational Palliative Care Research CenterNeurocritical Care SocietyUniversity of CambridgeNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMcMaster University
KeywordsMedicinePediatric intensive care unitGeneralizability theoryPsychological interventionDelphi methodMEDLINEFamily medicinePediatricsNursingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To identify a PICU Core Outcome Measurement Set (PICU COMS), a set of measures that can be used to evaluate the PICU Core Outcome Set (PICU COS) domains in PICU patients and their families. DESIGN: A modified Delphi consensus process. SETTING: Four webinars attended by PICU physicians and nurses, pediatric surgeons, rehabilitation physicians, and scientists with expertise in PICU clinical care or research ( n = 35). Attendees were from eight countries and convened from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Pediatric Outcomes STudies after PICU Investigators and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network PICU COS Investigators. SUBJECTS: Measures to assess outcome domains of the PICU COS are as follows: cognitive, emotional, overall (including health-related quality of life), physical, and family health. Measures evaluating social health were also considered. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measures were classified as general or additional based on generalizability across PICU populations, feasibility, and relevance to specific COS domains. Measures with high consensus, defined as 80% agreement for inclusion, were selected for the PICU COMS. Among 140 candidate measures, 24 were delineated as general (broadly applicable) and, of these, 10 achieved consensus for inclusion in the COMS (7 patient-oriented and 3 family-oriented). Six of the seven patient measures were applicable to the broadest range of patients, diagnoses, and developmental abilities. All were validated in pediatric populations and have normative pediatric data. Twenty additional measures focusing on specific populations or in-depth evaluation of a COS subdomain also met consensus for inclusion as COMS additional measures. CONCLUSIONS: The PICU COMS delineates measures to evaluate domains in the PICU COS and facilitates comparability across future research studies to characterize PICU survivorship and enable interventional studies to target long-term outcomes after critical illness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.113
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.171
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1130.171
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.492
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread0.068 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207