A self-supervised contrastive learning approach for whole slide image representation in digital pathology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Image analysis in digital pathology has proven to be one of the most challenging fields in medical imaging for AI-driven classification and search tasks. Due to their gigapixel dimensions, whole slide images (WSIs) are difficult to represent for computational pathology. Self-supervised learning (SSL) has recently demonstrated excellent performance in learning effective representations on pretext objectives, which may improve the generalizations of downstream tasks. Previous self-supervised representation methods rely on patch selection and classification such that the effect of SSL on end-to-end WSI representation is not investigated. In contrast to existing augmentation-based SSL methods, this paper proposes a novel self-supervised learning scheme based on the available primary site information. We also design a fully supervised contrastive learning setup to increase the robustness of the representations for WSI classification and search for both pretext and downstream tasks. We trained and evaluated the model on more than 6000 WSIs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository provided by the National Cancer Institute. The proposed architecture achieved excellent results on most primary sites and cancer subtypes. We also achieved the best result on validation on a lung cancer classification task.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it