MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293579517 · doi:10.4271/2022-01-1025

Measurement of the Particulate Matter Emission from Internal Combustion Engines Using an Automatic Method

2022· article· en· W4293579517 on OpenAlexaff
Sławomir Janas, Andrzej Szczotka, T. Szumiata

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesCombustionInternal combustion engineAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of measurements of an automatic weighing system used to assess the mass emission of particulate matter emitted by internal combustion engines. Thirty test cycles were carried out for cars equipped with spark-ignition and compression-ignition engines that met the Euro 4, Euro 5 and Euro 6 emission standards. Exhaust gas samples for analysis were taken according to EU 2017/1151 recommendations for driving cycles performed on AVL and Zöllner chassis dynamometers, AVL-CVS i60 LD LE and HORIBA-CVS 7400 S exhaust-gas collection systems, WLTC driving cycle according to EU 2017/1151, NEDC according to UNECE No. 83, RDE, RTS and TFL cycles, non-standard cycles of car manufacturers. The mass emission of particulate matter was measured using Teflon-coated glass filters of Pallflex® Emfab™ type TX40HI20WW, which ranged between 96 ÷ 102 mg. The mass of the filters was measured with a manual method using an MSE2.7S-000-DF scale manufactured by Sartorius and an automatic method using an UMA 2.4Y.F system manufactured by Radwag Wagi Elektroniczne. The mass measurement precision of the manual system for the mass standard was 0.0003 mg, and for the reference filter 0.0034 mg. The precision of the automatic system was 0.0004 mg and 0.0002 mg, respectively. For the reference filter, the measurement precision of the automatic system was more than 18 times better than that of the manual system. It was found that the mass of particulate matter emitted by internal combustion engines ranged between 0.01 mg ÷ 0.52 mg and that the emission of particulate matter ranged between 0.04 mg/km ÷ 2.46 mg/km. The maximum difference in particulate matter emission obtained with the manual and automatic systems was 0.10 mg/km. It was found that the use of the automatic system significantly influenced the ergonomics of the test process by greatly reducing the time taken to test changes in filter mass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicVehicle emissions and performanceFrench-language works237,207