Conditionally reprogrammed asthmatic bronchial epithelial cells express lower <i>FOXJ1</i> at terminal differentiation and lower <i>IFNs</i> following RV-A1 infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Primary bronchial epithelial cells (pBECs) obtained from donors have limited proliferation capacity. Recently, conditional reprogramming (CR) technique has overcome this and has provided the potential for extended passaging and subsequent differentiation of cells at air-liquid interface (ALI). However, there has been no donor-specific comparison of cell morphology, baseline gene expression, barrier function, and antiviral responses compared with their “parent” pBECs, especially cells obtained from donors with asthma. We, therefore, collected and differentiated pBECs at ALI from mild donors with asthma ( n = 6) for the parent group. The same cells were conditionally reprogrammed and later differentiated at ALI. Barrier function was measured during the differentiation phase. Morphology and baseline gene expression were compared at terminal differentiation. Viral replication kinetics and antiviral responses were assessed following rhinovirus (RV) infection over 96 h. Barrier function during the differentiation phase and cell structural morphology at terminal differentiation appear similar in both parent and CR groups, however, there were elongated cell structures superficial to basal cells and significantly lower FOXJ1 expression in CR group. IFN gene expression was also significantly lower in CR group compared with parent asthma group following RV infection. The CR technique is a beneficial tool to proliferate pBECs over extended passages. Considering lower FOXJ1 expression, viral replication kinetics and antiviral responses, a cautious approach should be taken while choosing CR cells for experiments. In addition, as lab-to-lab cell culture techniques vary, the most appropriate technique must be utilized to best match individual cell functions and morphologies to address specific research questions and experimental reproducibility across the labs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".