Multienzyme activity profiling for evaluation of cell‐to‐cell variability of metabolic state
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In solid organs, cells of the same "type" can vary in their molecular phenotype. The basis of this state variation is being revealed by characterizing cell features including the expression pattern of mRNAs and the internal distribution of proteins. Here, the variability of metabolic state between cells is probed by enzyme activity profiling. We study individual cells of types that can be identified during the post-mitotic phase of oogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Whole-cell homogenates of isolated oocytes are used for kinetic analysis of enzymes, with a focus on the initial reaction rate. For each oocyte type studied, the activity signatures of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and malate dehydrogenase 1 (MDH1) vary more between the homogenates of single oocytes than between repeat samplings of control homogenates. Unexpectedly, the activity signatures of GAPDH and MDH1 strongly co-vary between oocytes of each type and change in strength of correlation during oogenesis. Therefore, variability of the kinetic behavior of these housekeeping enzymes between "identical" cells is physiologically programmed. Based on these findings, we propose that single-cell profiling of enzyme kinetics will improve understanding of how metabolic state heterogeneity is related to heterogeneity revealed by omics methods including proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".