Electrophoretic mobility of individual molecules of alkaline phosphatase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrophoretic mobilities and catalytic rates of individual molecules of bovine intestinal alkaline phosphatase were determined in CHES and borate buffers of identical pH using a capillary electrophoresis based method. Both properties were found to be heterogeneous. In the presence of CHES, the mobility and rate were found to be −1.9 ± 0.2 × 10 −9 m 2 V −1 s −1 and 9.8 ± 7.4 × 10 4 min −1 ( N = 38), respectively. In the presence of borate, the mobility and rate were found to be −6.9 ± 0.5 × 10 −9 m 2 V −1 s −1 and 2.0 ± 1.3 × 10 4 min −1 ( N = 41), respectively. The means and variances for both properties were found to differ significantly between the two buffers. The difference in average mobility was attributed to an increase in negative charge caused by borate complexing with the carbohydrate moieties attached to the enzyme. The difference in variance was attributed to heterogeneous complexation with borate due to heterogeneity in the glycosylation. The differences in mean values for the catalytic rate were attributed to the inhibitory effect of borate and the difference in variance may suggest that the K I of this binding may also be heterogeneous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".