Reuse of Acid Bioleachate in Bacterial Oxidation of a Refractory Gold Sulfide Concentrate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacterial pre-oxidation of refractory gold concentrates generates large volumes of leachate and requires a significant supply of nutrients to support bacterial growth. Therefore, bioleachate reuse reduces both water consumption and the nutrients required for the process. However, the efficiency of this method and its benefit need to be further explored. In the present study, two tests on the reuse of bioleachate in new cycles of bacterial oxidation were carried out to evaluate the efficiency and the benefit of bioleachate reuse. Our results showed that the reuse of bioleachates could reduce nitrogen and phosphorus requirements by 40% and 36%, respectively, after a 14-day biooxidation stage in a stirred tank bioreactor. We also showed that the reuse of bioleachate had a positive effect on the recovery of gold in a subsequent 48 h treatment by cyanidation. The gold recovery rate (initial concentration of 44 mg/kg) remained unchanged at 90% after the two bioleachate recirculation loops. The reuse of bioleachate also made it possible to increase the solubilization rates of other metals from the sulfide concentrate. Thus, the solubilization yields of copper (initial concentration of 3587 mg/kg) and zinc (initial concentration of 27,315 mg/kg) increased, respectively, from 14.8% and 40.2% to 37.5% and 99.6% after the two bioleachate recirculation loops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".