Right-to-left ventricle ratio determined by machine learning algorithms on CT pulmonary angiography images predicts prolonged ICU length of stay in operated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Right-to-left ventricle diameter ratio (dRV/dLV) on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is a predictor of outcomes in non-operated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm for dRV/dLV measurement in operated CTEPH patients and its association with post-operative outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed consecutive CTEPH patients who underwent pulmonary endarterectomy between 2013 and 2017. ML calculated dRV/dLV on pre-operative CTPA and compared with manual measures. Associations of dRV/dLV with patient characteristics and post-operative outcomes were evaluated including intensive care (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) using multivariable linear regression analysis. Prolonged LOS was defined as greater than median. Results: ML segmented the ventricles in 99/125 (79%) patients. The most common cause of failure was misidentification of the moderator band as the interventricular septum (7.9%). Mean dRV/dLV by ML was 1.4 ± 0.4 and strongly correlated with manual measures (r = 0.9–0.96 p < 0.0001). dRV/dLV was moderately correlated with measures of pulmonary hypertension on right heart catheterization and RV dilatation on echocardiogram (r = 0.5–0.6, p < 0.0001). dRV/dLV ≥ 1.2 was associated with proximal Jamieson type disease (p = 0.032), longer cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.037), aortic cross-clamp (p = 0.022) and circulatory arrest (p < 0.001) at surgery and dRV/dLV ≥ 1.6 with post-operative ECMO (p = 0.006). dRV/dLV was independently associated with prolonged ICU LOS (OR = 3.79, 95% CI 1.1–13.06, p = 0.035). Conclusion: dRV/dLV was associated with CTEPH severity and independently associated with prolonged ICU LOS. This CT parameter may therefore assist in perioperative planning. Further refinement of the ML algorithm or CTPA technique is required to avoid errors in ventricular segmentation. Advances in knowledge: Automated right-to-left ventricle ratio measurement by machine learning is feasible and is independently associated with outcome after pulmonary endarterectomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".