MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293764725 · doi:10.1061/9780784484371.005

Ballast Resistance: Discreet vs. Unit Resistance

2022· article· en· W4293764725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Transportation and Development 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Engineering and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBallastResistance (ecology)Unit (ring theory)Computer scienceMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As per current industry practice, lateral resistance per tie or discreet resistance [N] is divided by the tie spacing to convert it to longitudinal resistance or unit resistance [N/cm] although lateral resistance of a tie from field test often comes without the mention of tie spacing and/or tie type. This is demonstrated in the paper that the use of tie spacing is not legitimate and would offer unacceptable value in case of short tie spacing. The potential source of error of using tie spacing is discussed. As an extension of the work, this is demonstrated that longitudinal resistance [N/cm] of a fastener obtained by dividing longitudinal restraint [N] of a fastener by its spacing is also dubious.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it