P05-03 The role of physical training in the correction of cognitive impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The purpose of the study was to evaluate the role of physical exercises in improving cognitive functions in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods The study protocol was approved by an ethics committee and all patients signed an informed consent. We examined 204 patients with type 2 diabetes aged 61.7 ± 11.2 years (persons hospitalized in the endocrinology department of the clinics of the Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk). Blind double method patients were randomized into 2 groups: the main one was engaged in physical therapy and the control group (observation). The study was carried out in two stages: at the first visit, a clinical and psychological examination was conducted, which included the Montreal Cognitive Function Assessment Scale and the Diabetes-dependent Quality of Life Questionnaire; repeated clinical and psychological examination was carried out after rehabilitation after 6 months Results At the first stage the study revealed the presence of cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes, mainly in tasks on visual-constructive skills, memory, attention and speech. These disorders were reduced after physical therapy (second stage) by 2.6 points (t = 0.01, p = 0.00006): visual-constructive skills (t = 0.0, p = 0.008), speech (t = 0.0, p = 0.005), abstraction (t = 0.0, p = 0.002) and memory (t = 0.0, p = 0.0007), no change in cognitive function occurred in the observation group. In terms of carbohydrate metabolism: the level of HbA1c decreased by 0.9%, fasting glycemia - by 1.6 mmol/L in main group, but increased by 0,1% of HbA1c and by 0,2 mmol/L of glycemia in the observation group (second stage) (t = 2.0, p = 0.000003; t = 3.0, p = 0.0008). Patients involved in physical therapy showed improvement in a larger number of parameters - leisure, travel, vacation, personal life, appearance, self-confidence, future confidence, financial situation, dependence, food choice, choice of drinks, total point (p > 0.05), when there was a decrease in points in the parameters of the control group. Conclusion During rehabilitation in patients with type 2 diabetes, there is an improvement in cognitive functions, carbohydrate metabolism and quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".