Three-dimensional large deformation modeling of landslides in spatially variable and strain-softening soils subjected to seismic loads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Landslide is a common dynamic large-deformation disaster of mobilized soils, which poses a serious threat to the lives and economic properties of surrounding people. Both the strain-softening effect and spatial variability of soil are reported to have significant impacts on landslide behaviors. This study investigated the coupled effect of strain softening and spatial variability on the occurrence, evolution, and runout behavior of landslides induced by seismic loads, using three-dimensional (3D) large-deformation finite-element method. The results show that both the strain-softening behavior and spatial variability of soil dramatically affect the sliding velocity and runout distance. Their coupled effect further weakens the soil strength, resulting in a larger runout distance. Secondly, the runout distance in the 3D deterministic analysis is always smaller than the minimum value in the corresponding random analysis, which completely differs from the result from the two-dimensional (2D) analysis. This finding indicates that 2D analysis can result in a conservative estimation on the runout distance for spatially variable soils and highlights the advantages of 3D modeling on landslides. Thirdly, a linear formula was proposed to quantify the runout distance based on the horizontal peak acceleration, which can provide some guidelines for the safety design in practical slope engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".