MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4294146843 · doi:10.1101/2022.08.26.22279284

Comparison of influenza and COVID-19 hospitalizations in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study

2022· preprint· en· W4294146843 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Solmaz Setayeshgar, James Wilton, Hind Sbihi, Moe Zandy, Naveed Z. Janjua, Alex Choi, Kate Smolina

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Centre for Disease Control
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBritish Columbia Centre for Disease ControlProvincial Health Services AuthorityMichael Smith Health Research BCPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsMedicinePandemicDemographyContext (archaeology)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PopulationCohortCohort studyPediatricsInternal medicineEnvironmental healthGeographyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective To compare the population rate of COVID-19 and influenza hospitalizations by age, COVID-19 vaccine status and pandemic phase. Design Observational retrospective study Setting Residents of British Columbia (population 5.3 million), Canada Participants Hospitalized patients due to COVID-19 or historical influenza Main outcome measures This population based study in a setting with universal healthcare coverage, used COVID-19 case and hospital data for COVID-19 and influenza. Admissions were selected from March 2020 to February 2021 for the annual cohort and the first 8 weeks of 2022 for the peak cohort of COVID-19 (Omicron era). Influenza annual and peak cohorts were from three years with varying severity: 2009/10, 2015/16, and 2016/17. We estimated hospitalization rates per 100,000 population by age group. Results Similar to COVID-19 with median age 66 (Q1-Q3 44-80), influenza 2016/17 mostly affected older adults, with median age 78 (64-87). COVID-19 and influenza 2016/17 hospitalization rate by age group were “J” shaped. The rates for mostly unvaccinated COVID-19 patients in 2020/21 in the context of public health restrictions were significantly higher than influenza among individuals 30 to 69 years of age, and comparable to a severe influenza year (2016/17) among 70+. In early 2022 (Omicron peak), rates primarily due to COVID-19 among vaccinated adults were comparable with influenza 2016/17 in all age groups while rates among unvaccinated COVID-19 patients were still higher than influenza among 18+. In the pediatric population, COVID-19 hospitalization rates were similar to or lower than influenza. Conclusions Our paper highlighted the greater population-level impact of COVID-19 compared with influenza in terms of adult hospitalizations, especially among those unvaccinated. However, influenza had greater impact than COVID-19 among <18 regardless of vaccine status or the circulating variant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→French-language works237,207→