MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294204438 · doi:10.1101/2022.08.30.22279374

The Natural History of Untreated Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022· review· en· W4294204438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bianca Sossen, Alexandra S Richards, Torben Heinsohn, Beatrice Frascella, Federica Balzarini, Aurea Oradini‐Alacreu, Anna Odone, Ewelina Rogozińska, Brit Häcker, Frank Cobelens, Katharina Kranzer, Rein M G J Houben, Hanif Esmail

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisObservational studyTuberculosisNatural historyPublication biasDiseaseInternal medicineSystematic reviewMEDLINEPediatricsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Key stages in TB disease can be delineated by radiology, microbiology and symptoms, but transition between relevant stages remains unclear. We sought to quantify progression and regression across the spectrum of TB disease by systematically reviewing studies of individuals with untreated TB undergoing follow up. METHODS We searched PubMED, EMBASE and Web of Science until December 31 st 1960, the Index Medicus between 1895 and 1945, and extensive investigator collections without date restriction - in English and German. Eligible studies were observational cohorts and clinical trials, presenting adults/adolescents with TB or recent TB exposure, undergoing follow-up for at least 12 months without therapeutic intervention. Two authors independently reviewed titles/abstracts and full texts for inclusion. Quality was assessed with a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Score, excluding highly biased studies. Summary estimates were extracted to align with TB disease transitions in a conceptual model, and we used meta-analysis of proportions with random-effects to synthesise the extracted data. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019152585). FINDINGS 10477 titles were screened and 1648 full texts reviewed. 223 met inclusion criteria. 109 were excluded for high risk of bias and 90 did not have extractable data. 24 studies (34 cohorts) were included. Progression from microbiologically negative to positive disease in those with radiographic TB evidence occurred at an annualized rate of 9.71% (95% CI:6.17-13.34) with “active” TB imaging, and 1.06% (95% CI:0.31-1.82) with “inactive” TB imaging. Reversion from microbiologically-positive to -undetectable in prospective cohorts occurred at an annualized rate of 12.40% (95% CI: 6.81-17.99). Studies reported symptoms poorly not allowing for direct estimation of transitions for subclinical (asymptomatic, culture positive) disease. INTERPRETATION We present the risk of progression in those with radiographic evidence of disease and the rate of self-cure for microbiologically positive disease to inform global disease burden estimates, clinical guidelines and policy decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207