MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294243563 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1807

COVID-19 vaccine coverage and factors associated with vaccine uptake among individuals with a recent experience of homelessness: a population-based analysis from Ontario, Canada.

2022· article· en· W4294243563 on OpenAlexaffabout
Salimah Z. Shariff, Lucie Richard, Stephen W. Hwang, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Cheryl Forchuk, Naheed Dosani, Richard A Booth

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReceiptPoisson regressionPopulationInfluenza vaccineDemographyCohortRelative riskCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Retrospective cohort studyCohort studyVaccinationEnvironmental healthConfidence intervalImmunologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ObjectivesTo describe COVID-19 vaccine coverage (i.e., the estimated percentage of people who have received a vaccine) and determinants of vaccine receipt among individuals with a recent experience of homelessness in Ontario, Canada. ApproachWe conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of 23,247 individuals (≥18 years) with a recent experience of homelessness as recorded in routinely collected healthcare databases. Participants were followed from December 14, 2020 to September 30, 2021 for the receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine. Using modified Poisson regression, we identified sociodemographic, healthcare usage, and clinical factors associated with the receipt of one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. ResultsBy September 30, 14,271 (61.4%) of participants with a recent experience of homelessness had received a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine and 11,082 (47.7%) had received two doses. Over the same period, 86.6% and 81.6% of the total adult population of Ontario had received a first dose and second dose, respectively. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with increased COVID-19 uptake included ≥1 visit to a general practitioner (adjusted Risk Ratio [aRR]:1.37[95% CI 1.31-1.42]), older age (vs. 18-29 years: 50-59 years, aRR:1.18[1.14-1.22]; 60+ years, aRR:1.27[1.22-1.31]), receipt of an influenza vaccine (aRR:1.25[1.23-1.28]), receipt of ≥1 SARS-CoV-2 test (aRR:1.23[1.20-1.26]) and the presence of chronic health conditions (vs. 0 conditions: 1 condition, aRR:1.05[1.03, 1.08]; 2+ conditions, aRR:1.11[1.08-1.14]). In contrast, living in a smaller metropolitan region (aRR:0.92[0.90-0.94]) or rural location (aRR:0.93[0.90-0.97]) compared to a large metropolitan region was associated with lower uptake. ConclusionsAs of September 30, 2021, COVID-19 vaccine coverage among individuals with a recent experience of homelessness in Ontario was substantially lower than the general adult population of Ontario for a first and second dose. Findings underscore the importance of leveraging organizations that are accessed and trusted by people who experience homelessness for targeted vaccine delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data ScienceSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207