Costs of missed work among employed people with inflammatory bowel disease: a cross-sectional population-representative study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ObjectivesInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Periods of relapsing and remitting abdominal pain and diarrhea result in decreased quality of life. We report the impact of IBD on missed work and associated costs using population-representative data to understand population-level indirect costs. ApproachWe used the 2014 Canadian Community Health Survey to compare missed work and associated costs among employed respondents aged 20 to 64 years with and without self-reported physician-diagnosed IBD. Students and individuals with non-IBD bowel disorders were excluded. Costs of missed work were derived from reported annual income and the number of workdays missed. Survey weights were used for descriptive statistics. Logistic regression compared odds of employment. Negative binomial models compared the number of days missed and the cost of lost work in the two groups. All costs are in Canadian dollars and adjusted for inflation to 2022 dollars. ResultsAmong 33,344 eligible respondents, 1.0% had IBD. Employment in the last 3 months was reported among 72% of people with IBD and 81% of people without IBD (OR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.59-0.74). During this time, 48% of people with IBD and 31% of those without IBD missed work with a mean (sd) of 1.99 (5.17) and 1.03 (3.67) days of work missed, respectively (RR for days missed: 2.19, 95% CI 1.63-3.03). This corresponds to a cost of $608 (1635) among individuals with IBD and $298 (1063) among those without IBD every 3 months (RR: 2.18, 95% CI 1.22-4.43). Extrapolating to the estimated 133,030 employed Canadians with IBD, the attributable indirect cost of missed work due to IBD is nearly $165 million annually. ConclusionThe economic burden of IBD resulting from missed work is substantial. Since IBD is most often diagnosed during adolescence and early adulthood, employability and workplace productivity are important long-term outcomes for patients. Future interventions should be developed to help address these challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".