Study the effect of COVID-19 on desire of pregnancy among women attending primary health care centers in Basra city
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed COVID -19 as a public Health Emergency on Jan30, 2020 and stated it as a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. In addition to the physical health effects of the virus in infected persons, the pandemic is also causing harmful social and mental health effects, which in turn can affect fertility, conception, gestation, and birth. Aim of study: To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on reproductive health decisions related to childbearing and pregnancy and economic conditions, and family planning during pandemic. Methodology: A cross - sectional study was conducted from 1st of February to 1st of June 2021, a total of 384 females at their reproductive age where interviewed to assess the effect of COVID-19 on their desire of pregnancy. Result: The mean age of the female sample was 30.5 years , quarter of them are of their primary education level, 38% are employed and 89.1% had children and 34.9% having history of abortion,50.8% of participant using contraception before pandemic, while only 9.2 % of contraceptive users were changed the type of contraception during pandemic. About 6.5 % used contraception as a first time during pandemic, while 41.1% think about to get pregnant before pandemic , 48.1% of them were changed their decision and don’t want to get pregnancy ,finally we found that 40% of participant got pregnant during pandemic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".