Evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of triptolide and (S)-10-hydroxycamptothecin on cutaneous and ocular Herpes Simplex Virus type-1 infections in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The emergence of Acyclovir-Resistant Herpes Simplex Virus type-1, which is the result of clinical over usage calls for the urgent need of a novel anti-HSV agent. Hence, the activity of Triptolide (TP) and (S)-10-Hydroxycamptothecin (10-HCPT) were investigated as natural products in two infection models of HSV-1. Methods The antiviral efficacy of TP and 10-HCPT was evaluated in mice ocular and cutaneous infection models of HSV. Groups of 10 mice were infected with HSV-1. Both compounds were administered topically on corneal and skin. The disease severity, viral titer (plaque reduction assay), and histopathology were evaluated in the ocular and cutaneous models of HSV-1 infection on days 3, 5, 7, 9, and 12 post infection, as well as genome loads on days 3 and 12. Results Topical treatment of corneal with TP, 10-HCPT, and ACV was effective in reducing stromal disease (after day 3, P = 0.001), plus TP and ACV on vascularization (after day 7, P = 0.001). The virus titer decreased significantly in the infected treated groups after day 3 (P < 0.05). Also, on day 12 post-infection, the virus genome volume in the TP and ACV groups was significantly reduced. With respect to virus titers and the DNA yield, significant difference was observed, merely in the ACV group in comparison to the control ( P = 0.013). Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that corneal epithelium healing was partially visible in the 10-HCPT group, which gradually increased in TP, and was the highest in the ACV group. The skin epithelium healing was only observed in TP and ACV groups, and was superior in the ACV group. Conclusions This study revealed the virologic and clinical potential of TP in-vivo to treat ocular mouse model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".