MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294308951 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02581

Experimental Study on Hydrate Structure Transition Using an In Situ High-Pressure Powder X-ray Diffractometer: Application in CO<sub>2</sub> Capture

2022· article· en· W4294308951 on OpenAlexaff
Asheesh Kumar, Nagu Daraboina, Praveen Linga, Rajnish Kumar, John A. Ripmeester

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersScience and Engineering Research BoardMinistry of Education - Singapore
KeywordsClathrate hydrateHydrateMethaneGas separationDifferential scanning calorimetryChemistryPowder diffractionNucleationDiffractometerCrystallizationIsochoric processMoleculeCrystallographyCrystal structureChemical engineeringThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clathrate (gas) hydrates as materials have received great interest due to their high-density gas storage potential and separation applications for their ability to preferentially separate a targeted component such as CO 2 from waste streams. Among the three clathrate hydrate structures, only sH (structure H) hydrates require a large molecule such as neohexane (NH) or tert -butyl methyl ether (TBME) as well as a “help-gas” molecule such as methane (CH 4 ) to form a stable structure. However, attempts to use CO 2 as a help-gas came up with mixed results where it appeared that the sH hydrate formed was stable only at temperatures below the ice point, whereas the compound formed with CH 4 was considerably more stable. sH hydrates have considerable potential for gas separation, for instance, of CH 4 –CO 2 mixtures. Thus, in this work, several compositions were tested for their hydrate forming ability. The large cage guests tested were NH and TBME, the help-gas mixtures were a CO 2 -rich mixture (76% CO 2 and 24% CH 4 ), and a CO 2 lean mixture (24% CO 2 and 76% CH 4 ). The phase behavior of hydrates formed from the various combinations was tested by measuring the endo- and exotherms associated with hydrate formation and decomposition in a high-pressure differential calorimeter. The different phases indicated from the DSC results were identified by employing an in situ high-pressure cell on a powder X-ray diffractometer. Powder patterns were recorded to identify the crystal phase arising from nucleation and possible re-crystallization events after annealing. It was confirmed that the CO 2 lean mixture (24% CO 2 and 76% CH 4 ) forms structure H (sH) hydrate, while the CO 2 -rich mixture (76% CO 2 and 24% CH 4 ) forms structure I (sI) hydrate presenting a structure transition pattern across the gas mixtures investigated. Further, it was observed that the CO 2 lean mixture, which forms sH hydrate, also starts as sI hydrate and gradually converts to the thermodynamically stable sH hydrate. This study, in essence, helps to understand the preference of CH 4 and CO 2 for three different types of cages in sH hydrates and presents a design framework for a suitable gas separation mechanism for this gas mixture of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207