MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294542938 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac8f0f

Utilization of focused ultrasound for opening of the blood-nerve barrier

2022· article· en· W4294542938 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel Umansky, Chenchen Bing, Tak‐Ho Chu, Saud Alzahrani, Jeff F. Dunn, Samuel Pichardo, Rajiv Midha

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
FundersHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of CalgaryAmerican Association of Neurological Surgeons
KeywordsMicrobubblesSonicationSciatic nerveUltrasoundBiomedical engineeringMagnetic resonance imagingCompound muscle action potentialMaterials scienceMedicineAnatomyRadiologyInternal medicineElectrophysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective . Focused ultrasound (FUS) use with and without microbubbles (MB) for investigation of the blood-nerve barrier (BNB) within the peripheral nervous system (PNS) has been performed in this study. We evaluate the feasibility of BNB opening in a rodent sciatic nerve model by direct vision FUS treatment and provide preliminary results of magnetic resonance guided FUS (MRgFUS). Approach . Twenty rodent bilateral sciatic nerves were investigated. Rodents were treated using a benchtop FUS system to directly visualize nerve FUS studies. Definity MB, Evans blue dye (EB) and latex micro beads were injected during studies. Selected animals underwent further compound muscle action potential (CMAP) studies. Sonication peak pressure (MPa), width, duty-cycle and duration as well as MB concentration were varied to investigate effective pressure threshold. Further preliminary MRgFUS studies were performed on selected animals. Immunohistochemistry and histological analysis under florescent microscopy were performed at termination of experiments to verify treatment outcomes. Main results . Three ultrasound pressures and three microbubble concentrations at a single sonication frequency (476.5 kHz) were performed under direct open targeting. Histological analysis demonstrated nerve internal architecture disruption at 1.2 MPa with 166.7 μ l kg −1 while 0.3 MPa, with 40 μ l kg −1 MB concentration was the lower threshold for consistently observed disruption of the BNB without anatomical microarchitecture disruption. EB leakage was confirmed at the target region in histological evaluation of nerve following MB injection and FUS sonication. Supra-harmonic emissions were detected during FUS exposures following MB injection but not at baseline reference, indicating effective MB response and stable cavitation. CMAP amplitudes showed delayed onset latency and lower amplitudes in sonicated nerves compared to control nerves without evidence of complete conduction block, suggesting a transient BNB disruption, while at lower limit pressure subtle conduction changes were observed. In MRgFUS, targeted nerves demonstrated further contrast agent leak as well as supra-harmonic frequency detection. Significance . Opening of the BNB in the PNS was achieved using FUS and MB in a rodent model. Ongoing work aims to refine FUS parameters for drug delivery into the nerve after experimental transient BNB disruption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207