MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294600028 · doi:10.1186/s12978-022-01485-9

Maternal nutritional risk factors for pre-eclampsia incidence: findings from a narrative scoping review

2022· article· en· W4294600028 on OpenAlexafffund
Mai‐Lei Woo Kinshella, Shazmeen Omar, Kerri Scherbinsky, Marianne Vidler, Laura A. Magee, Peter von Dadelszen, Sophie E. Moore, Rajavel Elango, Lucilla Poston, Hiten D. Mistry, Marie‐Laure Volvert, Cristina Escalona Lopez, Rachel Tribe, Andrew Shennan, Tatiana Taylor Salisbury, Lucy C. Chappell, Rachel Craik, Marleen Temmerman, Sikolia Wanyonyi, Geoffrey Omuse, Patricia Okiro, Grace Mwashigadi, Esperança Sevene, Helena Boene, Corssino Tchavana, Eusébio Macete, Carla Carillho, Lazaro Quimice, Sónia Maculuve, Donna Russell, Ben Baratt, Joy E Lawn, Hannah Blencowe, Véronique Filippi, Matt J. Silver, Prestige Tatenda Makanga, Liberty Makacha, Yolisa Prudence Dube, Newton Nyapwere, Reason Mlambo, Umberto D’Alessandro, Anna Roca, Melisa Martínez-Álvarez, Hawanatu Jah, Brahima A. Diallo, Abdul Karim Sesay, Fatima Touray, Abdoulie Sillah, J. Alison Noble, Aris T. Papageorghiou, Judith E. Cartwright, Guy Whitley, Sanjeev Krishna, Rosemarie Townsend, Asma Khalil, Joel Singer, Jing Li, Jeffrey N. Bone, Kelly Pickerill, Ash Sandhu, Tu Domena, William Stones

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research CouncilMidlands State UniversityUniversity of OxfordCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineGovernment of CanadaImperial College LondonKing's College LondonUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsEclampsiaMedicinePregnancyIncidence (geometry)EtiologyReproductive medicineObstetricsNarrative reviewIntensive care medicineBiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity that involves pregnancy-related stressors on the maternal cardiovascular and metabolic systems. As nutrition is important to support optimal development of the placenta and for the developing fetus, maternal diets may play a role in preventing pre-eclampsia. The purpose of this scoping review is to map the maternal nutritional deficiencies and imbalances associated with pre-eclampsia incidence and discuss evidence consistency and linkages with current understandings of the etiology of pre-eclampsia. METHODS: A narrative scoping review was conducted to provide a descriptive account of available research, summarize research findings and identify gaps in the evidence base. Relevant observational studies and reviews of observational studies were identified in an iterative two-stage process first involving electronic database searches then more sensitive searches as familiarity with the literature increased. Results were considered in terms of their consistency of evidence, effect sizes and biological plausibility. RESULTS: The review found evidence for associations between nutritional inadequacies and a greater risk of pre-eclampsia. These associations were most likely mediated through oxidative stress, inflammation, maternal endothelial dysfunction and blood pressure in the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia. Maternal nutritional risk factors for pre-eclampsia incidence with the strongest consistency, effect and biological plausibility include vitamin C and its potential relationship with iron status, vitamin D (both on its own and combined with calcium and magnesium), and healthy dietary patterns featuring high consumption of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish, seafood and monounsaturated vegetable oils. Foods high in added sugar, such as sugary drinks, were associated with increased risk of pre-eclampsia incidence. CONCLUSION: A growing body of literature highlights the involvement of maternal dietary factors in the development of pre-eclampsia. Our review findings support the need for further investigation into potential interactions between dietary factors and consideration of nutritional homeostasis and healthy dietary patterns. Further research is recommended to explore gestational age, potential non-linear relationships, dietary diversity and social, cultural contexts of food and meals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.075
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.075
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0170.017
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductive HealthSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207