Diagnostic of Supersonic High Frequency (HF) Plasma Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, two complementary techniques of diagnostic are used to study the properties of a supersonic HF plasma flow: namely, an enthalpy probe measurement and a flow visualization. A PL-35 induction plasma torch operating with three convergent-divergent Laval-type nozzles generates the plasma: a Mach 3.0 velocity water-cooled (wc) nozzle, a Mach 1.5 velocity wc nozzle and a Mach 2.45 velocity radiation-cooled (rc) nozzle. The plasma plate power is fixed at 20 kW and chamber pressure varies between 1 and 10 kPa. The plasma gas is argon and its flow is fixed at 60 slpm. The enthalpy probe profiles of local enthalpy and stagnation pressure are measured, from which, temperature, velocity and Mach number are obtained. The effect of nozzle design on plasma properties is investigated. The RC nozzle creates a plasma jet hotter with a steeper thermal profile and a higher mean velocity than the wc nozzle. The enthalpy probe calculations imply the assumption that the static pressure of the flow is similar to the chamber pressure. Experimental results show that this assumption is still applicable in the jet fringes, but its value changes strongly along the radial and axial axis. Also, photographs of the oblique shock wave in front of a cone in the plasma flow allow the approximation of the flow Mach number produced by a Mach 1.5 velocity wc nozzle. Its approximate value is 2.0, which is higher than predicted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".