IRS-Enabled Backscattering in a Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent reflecting surface (IRS)-enabled backscatter communications can be enabled by an access point (AP) that splits its transmit signal into modulated and unmodulated parts. This letter integrates non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) with this method to create a two-user primary system and a secondary system of IRS data. Considering the decoding order, we maximize the rate of the strongest primary user by jointly optimizing the IRS phase shifts, power splitting (PS) factor at the AP, and NOMA power coefficients while guaranteeing the quality of service (QoS) for both weak user and IRS data in the primary and secondary systems, respectively. The resulting optimization problem is non-convex. Thus, we split it into three parts and develop an alternating optimization (AO) algorithm. The advantage is that we derive closed-form solutions for the PS factor and NOMA power coefficients in the first two parts. In the third part, we optimize the phase shifts by exploiting semi-definite relaxation (SDR) and penalty techniques to handle the unit-modulus constraints. This algorithm achieves substantial gains (e.g., 40–68%) compared to relevant baseline schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".