The Growth and Influence of Thermally Grown Oxide in a Thermal Barrier Coating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The growth characteristics of thermally grown oxides (TGO) and their influence on microcracking in an air-plasma sprayed (APS) thermal barrier coating (TBC) were studied. The TBC samples were prepared in either as-received condition or with a pre-heat treatment. In the as-received TBC, TGO that formed upon thermal exposure predominantly consisted of layered and clustered chromia, spinels and nickel oxide, whereas in pre-heat treated samples the TGO was predominantly alumina. The growth characteristics of TGO was found to exhibit a three-stage behavior that was most pronounced in the as-received TBC. Micro-cracks were found to nucleate in clustered oxides, these cracks would grow in association with thickening of the TGO layer. Eventually, oxide-induced cracking and cracking along pre-existing discontinuities near the ceramic/bond coat interface led to spallation of the topcoat. A relationship between the maximum crack size and TGO thickness was established based on fracture mechanics considerations. This relationship is shown to be useful for TBC life prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".