MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Noninvasive Test For Estimating Type I Myosin Heavy Chain Expression In Women Using Mechanomyography

2022· article· en· W4294795605 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie A. Sontag, Mandy E. Parra, Hannah L. Dimmick, Adam J. Sterczala, Jonathan D. Miller, Jake A. Deckert, Philip M. Gallagher, Andrew C. Fry, Trent J. Herda, Michael A. Trevino

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exerciseMyosinLinear regressionMathematicsInternal medicineTorqueRegression analysisVastus lateralis muscleDynamometerMedicineStatisticsChemistryPhysicsSkeletal muscleEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine if mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS)-torque relationships could estimate type I percent myosin heavy chain expression (%MHC) of the vastus lateralis (VL) in sedentary women. METHODS: Fifteen healthy women (mean ± SD; age = 21.3 ± 5.3 yrs) volunteered for this study. Subjects performed 3 isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the knee extensors on an isokinetic dynamometer. The highest torque output determined the target torque levels for the subsequent randomly ordered isometric trapezoidal muscle actions at 30% and 70% MVC. An MMG sensor was placed on the VL. Simple linear regression models were fit to the log-transformed MMGRMS-torque relationships for the linear increasing and decreasing segments. MMGRMS was averaged for the steady torque segment. After testing, muscle biopsies were taken from the VL. %MHC was analyzed using SDS-PAGE. Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficients determined relationships among type I %MHC expression and each MMG variable (6 total). Sequential multiple-regression procedures determined if a predictive model for type I %MHC of the VL could be developed with the MMG variables significantly correlated with type I %MHC. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Type I %MHC was correlated with the b terms from the MMGRMS-torque relationships for the linearly increasing segments at 70% MVC (p = 0.003; r = -0.72) and MMGRMS for the steady torque segments at 30% (p = 0.008; r = -0.65) and 70% MVC (p = 0.040; r = -0.54). No other relationships existed (p > 0.05). For the regression model, correlated variables were added in order of significance. The addition of each variable significantly added to the model (p < 0.05) and overall accounted for 81.2% of the variance in type I %MHC (Table 1). CONCLUSION: MMGRMS may provide a noninvasive method for estimating type I %MHC of the VL in untrained women. Future research should investigate the utility of this model in other populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→